How Europe rates bathing water

Under the EU Bathing Water Directive, every country samples its official bathing sites through the season for two faecal-contamination indicators: E. coli and intestinal enterococci. The class is computed over the last four seasons — it is a track record, not a snapshot.

Home › How it works

The four classes

ExcellentThe strictest standard — consistently very low bacteria counts across four seasons.
GoodMeets the standard with a comfortable margin.
SufficientMeets only the legal minimum. Fine most days; weaker safety margin after rain.
PoorFailed the minimum. Authorities must advise against bathing — or ban it — for the whole season.
Not classifiedUsually a new or renamed site without four full seasons of data. Not a hidden problem.

What the rating does not tell you

It is a season-long verdict, not today's reading: a storm or sewage overflow can make any site temporarily unsafe. It says nothing about jellyfish, currents, algae blooms or lifeguards — only sewage-type contamination.

Why we show a five-season track record

A single Excellent year can be luck. The dataset keeps ten seasons per site, so we mark the sites that have held the top rating five seasons running, the ones that slipped to Poor recently, and the 619 that genuinely cleaned up. That history is the part official portals hide behind a click.

Where the data comes from

All classifications come from the European Environment Agency's official Bathing Water Directive dataset — the 2025 season assessment, the latest published. Re-used under the EEA standard re-use policy, refreshed when a new assessment is released.